sj banner thin 2016 04 01

  • Home
  • Public Participation
  • Public Meetings
  • Public Workshop #2 held for the Seymour Johnson AFB and Dare County Range Joint Land Use Study

Public Workshop #2 held for the Seymour Johnson AFB and Dare County Range Joint Land Use Study

The North Carolina Department of Commerce Rural Economic Development Division hosted the second public workshop for the Seymour Johnson AFB and Dare County Range Joint Land Use Study (JLUS) on May 17, 2016 at 6:00 pm at the Goldsboro City Hall Annex, 200 North Center Street, Goldsboro, NC 27530; May 18, 2016 at 5:00 pm at the Washington Civic Center located at 110 Gladden Street, Washington, NC 27889; and May 19, 2016 at 5:00 pm at the Dare County Administration Building located at 954 Marshall C Collins Drive, Manteo, NC 27954.

During this workshop the JLUS development team presented on overview of the JLUS and military footprints for the Seymour Johnson AFB and Dare County Range. Meeting attendees participated in a group exercise to provide input on the issues identified to date by placing drafting dots on large issue sheets, as well as identifying additional issues on blank issue sheets. Participants has an opportunity to ask questions with answers provided by the JLUS team. Links are provided below to the presentations and results of the public input exercise.

 

goldsboro thumbnail Click on the image to view the presentation from the workshop in Goldsboro
washington thumbnail Click on the image to view the presentation from the workshop in Washington
manteo thumbnail Click on the image to view the presentation from the workshop in Manteo

Click here to view the results of the public input exercise 

matrix color dg web   Copyright © 2015, Matrix Design Group, Inc.
This study was prepared under contract with the North Carolina Department of Commerce, with financial support from the Office of Economic Adjustment, Department of Defense and contributions from the State of North Carolina. The content reflects the views of the key JLUS partners involved in the development of this study and does not necessarily reflect the views of the Office of Economic Adjustment.